|

Marketing AID$ is big bucks (updated)

It is not just about saving lives or finding a cure. It’s very much about making money, and AIDS treatments have long been considered a global marketing opportunity.

$700 AIDS Marketing Report from aarkresearch

Mainstream AIDS proponents hate to have this issue brought up and would like to pretend that no one is getting rich from the current test-everyone-and-give-them-drugs public health strategy.

Yet virus co-discoverers Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier have become millionaires thanks to the profits from their patent on so-called “HIV tests”.

Pharmaceutical companies pillage consumers with expensive drugs, earning higher profits than any other industry. While the rest of the global economy has been tanking recently, Gilead just reported its fourth-quarter profit last year rose 41 percent on increased sales of its AIDS drug Truvada.

An advanced google search of Peter Staley’s blog at poz.com (owned by the appropriately named aidsmeds.com, which Staley founded) could be read like an insider’s guide for anyone considering investing in pharmaceutical stocks. That’s not surprising, considering Staley was a Wall Street bond trader in the 1980s, before becoming a professional AIDS drug activist.

TheBody.com, arguably one of the top rated AIDS websites, is funded almost entirely by pharmaceutical giants. Plenty of traffic to that site is assured by patients seeking relief from medication side effects on one of the “Ask the Experts” forums there.

TheBody.com:  Just another front for BigPharma?
TheBody.com: just another front for BigPharma?

There’s so much money to be made on AIDS$ that a company called aarkresearch is even selling a 25-page report (see graphic at top of post) entitled Global HIV Market: An Analysis for $700! Better hurry, I hear they’re going fast.

What’s in this report? I didn’t buy it, so I don’t know more than what aarkresearch wants to say on their blog:

The report outlines major countries affected from HIV virus and death rates. It also gives an overview of HIV virus and therapies in demand. The report presents overview of global market, HIV in US, UK, Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. It highlights major markets for HIV drugs with overall market value and major drugs revenue.

The report discusses the opportunities prevailing in the HIV drugs market and issues affecting the growth. It also talks about competition prevalent in the market. It profiles major players with an overview of their business, key financials and business strategies.

Of course not everyone is making bucks on AIDS. Still, there is a huge question begging to be asked when an alleged epidemic disease and its treatments are considered simply major marketing “opportunities”.

UPDATED:

How could I have overlooked the (RED) campaign?!

~*~


// <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
//

Wait... there's more!

  • 97

    97. That’s my latest CD4+ count, less than half the count from six weeks ago.

    That’s it. I have tried as many alternative treatments as I can think of to reverse the decline. I will be starting my third round of pharmaceutical ARVs as soon as I can get a prescription and fill it.

    This decision has been a long time coming, and in hindsight, I probably should have restarted a few months ago. There’s nothing magical about 97, or being below 100, but it’s as good a breaking point as any. I’ve long argued that there are two things to keep in mind about CD4 counts: one is the long-term trend; the other is single- or low double-digit counts.

  • Reduce AIDS drug toxicity and side effects

    I embarked on my third course of ARVs since 1998. For ten of the sixteen years I have been HIV-positive, I was able to manage well enough without ARVs and I continue to believe there is no reason for otherwise healthy HIV-positive—let alone negative—gay men to take these drugs. To those who want to wave a recent study about the benefits of early intervention in my face, I would ask them why they put so much faith in a science that has utterly failed us to date.

  • The truth about Truvada: PrEP won’t stop AIDS

    I’m willing to grant that gay men are entitled to use PrEP… provided they have access to all the information they need to make an informed decision. Informed consent has been a hallmark of the HIV and AIDS research and prevention efforts for three decades, and that shouldn’t be waived for the campaign favoring PrEP.

    Gay men deserve to know that all the claims for Truvada reducing the risk of acquiring HIV-positivity  are based on trials—funded by Gilead—that emphasized the importance of using condoms…

  • Confessions of a heretic AIDS dissident

    You might not know it from reading the comments left here on my blog, but there are more than a few AIDS dissidents who really don’t like how I think or what I write about.

    There’s a whole thread on a very popular Facebook page called “Rethinking AIDS”, discussing my open letter to Dora. Last I looked, that thread had nearly 100 comments, and very few of those comments were about Dora, Ruggiero or the defense of academic freedom.

    No, the gist of the thread was whether or not I am in “the AIDS Zone.” It seems that because I did not use “air quotes” around the term “HIV disease”, I’m not really an AIDS dissident. Others took issue with my post for daring to publish that some AIDS Rethinkers hold a very narrow view about “HIV” and “AIDS”, while others of us are merely “questioning” the whole affair. None of them chose to comment directly to me here.

    Some of the most visible and vocal Rethinkers seem intent on imposing their own “beliefs” (another loaded term that deserves quotes) on the entire movement. There has long been a tendency to try to impose a sort of litmus test to determine whether or not one is a true “AIDS dissident”.

    Since I first met the AIDS dissident community via the AIDS Myth Exposed forums—since renamed Questioning AIDS—several years ago, I’ve become aware of several of the various factions, distinctive personalities and divisions within that broad group. Now I’m finding it ironic just how guilty some of these people are at their own version of “bone-pointing”.

4 Comments

  1. AIDS has degenerated into a racket. You can’t make money in the health industry, unless you sell sickness.

    Selling AIDS has been a key component of the medical establishment. It worked once, but it won’t work forever. It failed with the bird flu, swine flu, west nile virus, ebola virus.

    AIDS Inc. will be the last gasp of a rotten regime. Too bad so many people committed suicide on HIV diagnoses in the past or were poisoned with AZT or were simply stigmatized into depression.

    You’re doing good things here, Jonathan.

    In good health,

    Felix

    1. Felix: I wish I was as optimistic as you that AIDS will be the last gasp. I fear it may become a toehold for taking us even further down the road to a 100% synthetic, mechanical model of medical care that only recognizes “health” as a word to be co-opted. Of course I wouldn’t be doing this if I thought all hope was lost, so thanks for the encouraging words.

  2. Hi Jonathan,

    Don’t want to be accused of “rosy optimism.” When I mean last gasp, I don’t necessarily mean it will end soon.

    I do think that the massive scaremongering won’t work again, though. People can see through it. Homophobia has subsided. Western Medicine has been discredited in many important ways. People have to take care of their OWN health, and not outsource it to experts.

  3. This post has been updated to include the (RED) campaign as another example of marketing with AIDS. The (RED) campaign promotes upscale products with a feel-good promise that a portion of profits will be used to benefit BigPharma by purchasing (toxic) AIDS drugs for poor Africans, regardless of their access to nutritional food, clean water, or basic health services.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *