Anita Bryant to resume anti-gay crusade

James Miko is a ballsy reporter with Gossip Boy an Oklahoma City gay e-magazine. Miko recently went undercover to bryant-pull-quoteinvestigate the infamous 1970s orange juice queen and anti-gay crusader Anita Bryant and in the process uncovered much more than he bargained for.

Using his newfound friendship with Bryant, Miko updates his readers on her career and subsequent retreat from the entertainment meccas of Eureka Springs, Arkansas and Branson, Missouri to her current home in Oklahoma City. He details her relationship with Jerry Falwell, her million dollar home and even the 1977 televised event where gay protesters threw a banana cream pie in her face.

At age 69 (in a few days), Bryant has gays and lesbians in the crosshairs her sight once again:

Hidden on the fourth floor of a restored building in the Bricktown entertainment district of Oklahoma City, three stories directly above a Hooters restaurant franchise, is the Anita Bryant Ministries International, Inc

The organization quietly keeps its physical location of 115 E. California secret from the public and only provides a post office box for contact, but Gossip Boy was able to ferret out the legendary gay civil rights opponent and stage an undercover operation to expose her plans to wage a new battle against homosexuals.

The secure building that houses Bryant’s offices is shared by other, more nefarious businesses, all managed by husband Charlie Dry. Apparently Dry is not a nice guy.

Events turned sinister as this reporter soon realized he was not just in the middle of an anti-gay ministry, but that Bryant’s offices were in the midst of Dry’s Government Procurement Services LLC, which isn’t everything it appears to be, but is more likely an influence peddling operation he runs with shadow partner J. C. Watts, a former U.S. congressman and potential Oklahoma gubernatorial candidate. Then it was discovered the entire fourth floor of 115 East California was filled with defense contractors involved in the machinations of war, such as Long Wave Inc. Down below tourists walked along the water canal or ordered chicken wings in a restaurant, while just above them secretive merchants of death were networking with Native American tribal officials and using them as minority-preference fronts in order to obtain multi-million dollar contracts with the United States Department of Defense.

Miko’s report is lengthy and I won’t copy/paste any more of it here. These tidbits should be enough for those who want to read the further remarkable adventures of this gay undercover reporter. Part two is scheduled to be published Saturday.

Click on Anita below for the full read:

Anita Bryant
click here for full report

~

Wait... there's more!

  • Retreat and Adventure — Midwest Men’s Festival

    When I received my HIV diagnosis in 1998, I withdrew from my community of gay men. I “went to ground”, thinking that isolation was the only safe place to avoid being criticized for seroconverting at such a late date, when we were all supposed to know better.

    This past week has been yet another bifurcation point in my life. I returned to a community I have known about, if not been a steady part of, for more than 30 years. A community of men whom I could touch and hug. Men whose tears might wet my face and whose body heat and life forces I could feel in ways that can only happen in person. It really did feel like coming home.

  • The truth about Truvada: PrEP won’t stop AIDS

    I’m willing to grant that gay men are entitled to use PrEP… provided they have access to all the information they need to make an informed decision. Informed consent has been a hallmark of the HIV and AIDS research and prevention efforts for three decades, and that shouldn’t be waived for the campaign favoring PrEP.

    Gay men deserve to know that all the claims for Truvada reducing the risk of acquiring HIV-positivity  are based on trials—funded by Gilead—that emphasized the importance of using condoms…

  • Confessions of a heretic AIDS dissident

    You might not know it from reading the comments left here on my blog, but there are more than a few AIDS dissidents who really don’t like how I think or what I write about.

    There’s a whole thread on a very popular Facebook page called “Rethinking AIDS”, discussing my open letter to Dora. Last I looked, that thread had nearly 100 comments, and very few of those comments were about Dora, Ruggiero or the defense of academic freedom.

    No, the gist of the thread was whether or not I am in “the AIDS Zone.” It seems that because I did not use “air quotes” around the term “HIV disease”, I’m not really an AIDS dissident. Others took issue with my post for daring to publish that some AIDS Rethinkers hold a very narrow view about “HIV” and “AIDS”, while others of us are merely “questioning” the whole affair. None of them chose to comment directly to me here.

    Some of the most visible and vocal Rethinkers seem intent on imposing their own “beliefs” (another loaded term that deserves quotes) on the entire movement. There has long been a tendency to try to impose a sort of litmus test to determine whether or not one is a true “AIDS dissident”.

    Since I first met the AIDS dissident community via the AIDS Myth Exposed forums—since renamed Questioning AIDS—several years ago, I’ve become aware of several of the various factions, distinctive personalities and divisions within that broad group. Now I’m finding it ironic just how guilty some of these people are at their own version of “bone-pointing”.

  • Pharmaceutical solutions to AIDS are not enough

    A recent phone conversation with a friend is helping me to continue to refine what I want to focus on as an AIDS dissident activist. In a passionate outburst that revealed a new side of his character, he blurted out his dismay that our society in general and our gay community in particular seems to be willing to settle for a solution to AIDS that relies exclusively on drugs from the pharmaceutical industry.

6 Comments

  1. Well, I almost hope she comes back, and with a vengence. Maybe we gay guys can all band together on an issue other than gay marriage or “AIDS”.

    I’m old enough to remember her campaign of hate. Pretty amazing. But, the flip side is that it got the disparate gay community motivated, focused – and more than anything – we began to actually OWN our sexuality, our right to be who we are.

    Sad thing is, though, we quickly gave it all away several years later when it was agreed upon that a retrovirus had a special hate for gay men. It’s taken years, but through viewing ourselves as victims and getting all that victim-based love (or is it pity?), we’ve made great strides in politics and social acceptance.

  2. Who the fuck cares? You’re gay, so what.

    I’ve never heard Anita Bryant say she hates gays, have you?

    Christians just hate the sin of homosexuality, not the sinner.

    Seems it’s you GAYS that HATE people that don’t accept your sinful ways. That said, homosexuality (as a sin) is no worse than any other sin a Christian may commit. The bible says only 1 sin is worse than all the others, and that’s “Taking the Lord’s name in vein”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *