| |

KC gay rights debate–20 years ago

I found some old video recordings of the televised public hearings for Kansas City’s gay rights ordinance 20 years ago. Between the poor quality of the original VCR tapes and the transition to digital, they look even older than that.

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dTZTuoWoQE&hl=en_US&fs=1&]

You gotta’ love those glasses!


City council committee hearings here are televised on a local cable channel and more than 12 hours of public testimony given by hundreds of supporters and opponents  at three public hearings were broadcast repeatedly over the course of several weeks.  It ended up being a major media campaign that we could never have purchased and that has undoubtedly helped contribute to making KC a very tolerant city for gays and lesbians in the Midwest.

As co-founder and co-director of the Human Rights Project (HRP), which was formed to introduce and support this legislation, this was one of the most exciting years of my life.  That effort is intertwined with my campaign in 1991 as the first openly gay candidate for city council.

yard signWe failed to pass the gay rights law in 1990, I didn’t win that race in 1991. Information gleaned from the results of the campaign did, however, provide incontrovertible evidence of a tangible and powerful LGBT community here that now influences all local elections. Tim VanZandt benefited from demographic analyses we performed and was subsequently elected as the first openly gay state representative in Missouri in 1994.

The at-large race also helped to mobilize and organize enough political clout to ensure that the newly elected 13-member city council and mayor would ultimately pass a gay- and lesbian-inclusive civil rights ordinance in 1993. I suppose one could say the vote was unanimous among the eight council members in attendance, though four members were absent and one voted to allow the vote and then left before it actually took place.

Wait... there's more!

  • Retreat and Adventure — Midwest Men’s Festival

    When I received my HIV diagnosis in 1998, I withdrew from my community of gay men. I “went to ground”, thinking that isolation was the only safe place to avoid being criticized for seroconverting at such a late date, when we were all supposed to know better.

    This past week has been yet another bifurcation point in my life. I returned to a community I have known about, if not been a steady part of, for more than 30 years. A community of men whom I could touch and hug. Men whose tears might wet my face and whose body heat and life forces I could feel in ways that can only happen in person. It really did feel like coming home.

  • The truth about Truvada: PrEP won’t stop AIDS

    I’m willing to grant that gay men are entitled to use PrEP… provided they have access to all the information they need to make an informed decision. Informed consent has been a hallmark of the HIV and AIDS research and prevention efforts for three decades, and that shouldn’t be waived for the campaign favoring PrEP.

    Gay men deserve to know that all the claims for Truvada reducing the risk of acquiring HIV-positivity  are based on trials—funded by Gilead—that emphasized the importance of using condoms…

  • Confessions of a heretic AIDS dissident

    You might not know it from reading the comments left here on my blog, but there are more than a few AIDS dissidents who really don’t like how I think or what I write about.

    There’s a whole thread on a very popular Facebook page called “Rethinking AIDS”, discussing my open letter to Dora. Last I looked, that thread had nearly 100 comments, and very few of those comments were about Dora, Ruggiero or the defense of academic freedom.

    No, the gist of the thread was whether or not I am in “the AIDS Zone.” It seems that because I did not use “air quotes” around the term “HIV disease”, I’m not really an AIDS dissident. Others took issue with my post for daring to publish that some AIDS Rethinkers hold a very narrow view about “HIV” and “AIDS”, while others of us are merely “questioning” the whole affair. None of them chose to comment directly to me here.

    Some of the most visible and vocal Rethinkers seem intent on imposing their own “beliefs” (another loaded term that deserves quotes) on the entire movement. There has long been a tendency to try to impose a sort of litmus test to determine whether or not one is a true “AIDS dissident”.

    Since I first met the AIDS dissident community via the AIDS Myth Exposed forums—since renamed Questioning AIDS—several years ago, I’ve become aware of several of the various factions, distinctive personalities and divisions within that broad group. Now I’m finding it ironic just how guilty some of these people are at their own version of “bone-pointing”.

  • Here’s to Gos Blank

    Most of us in his Internet online community knew Gos as a vocal advocate of the AIDS dissident community; a group of people who question and challenge the mainstream theory that the so-called Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is the sole and sufficient cause of AIDS. Yes, Gos was HIV-positive, but he insisted that the available scientific evidence does not support the notion that it is a sexually transmitted pathogen, capable of causing disease. Gos believed his positive test was a “false positive,” and the result of his pre-existing illnesses.

  • Did Gos Blank die of AIDS? – UPDATED

    So, did Gos Blank die of AIDS? That was the original question, was it not? That is what both AIDS dissidents and the AIDS apologist trolls are waiting to hear, isn’t it?

    I don’t know how it is possible to come to any conclusion that would satisfy both sides. Any answer given would only raise more questions, though not many new ones, really. Before anyone starts dancing on Gos’ grave, let’s examine some of these questions… in Gos’ own words as much as possible. (Unless noted otherwise, all blockquotes from this point on are from Gos’ book)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *